Campaign to stop votes for far-right party

April 9, 2008
Johnny Nelson

Sports stars have joined politicians speaking out as part of a campaign launched in Sheffield
against the British National Party before the local elections.

Boxing trainer Brendan Ingle, current and retired world champion boxers Junior Witter and Johnny Nelson, plus representatives from mainstream political parties voiced their opposition to the far-right organisation’s “divisive and racist messages”.

Brendan said: “Sport is one of the best ways I know to bring people together and reject racism. I urge everyone to use their vote to stop the British National Party.”

Johnny added: “The BNP is bad news for Sheffield. It is a racist party which will only bring violence to our city by turning neighbours and communities against each other.” The event, organised by Sheffield Unite Against Fascism, took place at Brendan Ingle’s Wincobank gym, which is in Shiregreen and Brightside ward, where the BNP candidate came second in last year’s poll.

Sheffield Telegraph

BNP Man Bit Confused

April 9, 2008


TWO British National Party candidates will be elected unopposed to a North Wales town council on May 1. Election officials in Conwy this week released documents showing the BNP is fielding a host of candidates in the town/community council elections.

In the elections for Bay of Colwyn Town Council, BNP candidate Paul Harley, of Penrhyn Bay, is unopposed in the Dinarth Ward in Rhos-on-Sea. There are three vacancies and only three candidates.

In nearby Rhos Ward, BNP candidate John Oddy, of Rhos-on-Sea, is among four candidates who will fill most of the five vacancies. But a third BNP candidate due to stand in Kinmel Bay Ward said he felt misled into standing and last night vowed to withdraw.

Neil Hughes, 19, is a BNP member, and would be one of eight candidates to fill eight vacancies in Kinmel Bay Ward for Towyn and Kinmel Bay Town Council on May 1. But he said last night a BNP man had visited his home three weeks ago and made him sign election papers several times. Mr Hughes said the BNP man said he could become a “paper candidate” and “resign on May 1.” But joinery student Mr Hughes was shocked to be told he was a candidate by the Daily Post. Mr Hughes, a student at Coleg Llandrillo Cymru in Rhos-on-Sea, said: “I’m shocked. A BNP man came to our house three weeks ago and asked me to sign papers. I thought I was supporting someone else to stand. I don’t want to stand. I’m annoyed about this.” Asked for his views on immigration, Mr Hughes, of Maesgwyn, Kinmel Bay, said: “I don’t want to say anything. I’m a bit confused.”
Meanwhile, the two bona fide, unopposed BNP candidates could be joined by fellow BNP hopefuls in other seats on May 1. There are seven other BNP candidates standing for town council elections in Conwy, and nine BNP candidates in Conwy County Council elections on May 1.

One is Neil Hughes who is set to withdraw from this contest too. BNP North West Wales regional organiser John Oddy, 51, of Rhos-on-Sea, said: “There was certainly no intention to mislead Neil. He was intended as a paper candidate, there to take votes from the main parties but it was not our intention he would win the seat and we were not going to leaflet for him. It was just a case of having a BNP member on the list. “As it turned out and to our surprise he was elected unopposed. This may have led to the misunderstanding. We will now withdraw him as a candidate on Wednesday.”
Last night Clwyd West MP David Jones said: “The BNP are a racialist and pretty odious party. I don’t think those seeking election will be successful here. North Wales is not the sort of territory that would welcome the BNP.”

Mr Oddy denied being racist.

North Wales Daily Post

Police probe right-wing leaflet drop

April 9, 2008


A member of the far-right British National Party (BNP) allegedly infiltrated the University of York mail system to deliver “offensive” material. Numerous members of university staff received leaflets issued by a BNP worker, which included strong attacks on Muslims.

One university staff member said the man distributing the leaflets had posed as a university employee to access the post room.

Tony Bamber, who produced and jointly distributed the leaflets, denied impersonating anyone, but confirmed he had visited the postal room “like I was from any postal company delivering post”.

A university spokesman said: “We deplore the underhand use of the university’s internal mail system, whose working practices have now been changed to guard against any repetition. Many staff found this material offensive, and we have forwarded copies of the various letters to North Yorkshire Police.”

Mr Bamber, of Lancashire, distributed at least two different leaflets, one of which has been forwarded to The Press.

It accuses Britain’s political leaders of failing to defend Britain’s economy, culture and land, and says they have failed the nation by allowing Muslims to create “large and hostile colonies”. It says the political elite should “destroy themselves”.

Mr Bamber said York was targeted because of comments by the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, on the slave trade last year.

A spokesman for the archbishop said the issue was not worthy of comment.

The university spokesman said the university’s guiding principles included freedom of speech, but also tolerance and respect for diversity.

Sam Bayley, societies and communications officer for York University Students Union, said he was not aware of students being targeted recently, but said most were currently away on Easter holidays.

He added: “The union does not want the BNP targeting our students, because it makes a lot of our students uncomfortable on campus. The BNP goes against a lot of aims we have and certainly against some of our equal opportunities policies.”

He said the union had passed a motion condemning the BNP, and added: “Our students do not want to see them on campus, and we will do what we can to support them in that.”

A North Yorkshire Police spokeswoman said: “We are aware of the allegations and we have commenced an investigation, which is currently in its very early stages, and inquiries are ongoing.”

A second leaflet, not yet seen by The Press, blames Muslims for the heroin trade in Britain. The leaflets are attributed to the Preston Pals, a group set up by Mr Bamber.

He told The Press the indigenous people of the British Isles had been “betrayed” and said the group modelled itself on a “Ghandian” approach.

In the leaflets, he said: “I personally went to the post room and handed them in like I was from any postal company delivering post, instead of using the Post Office and spending money on stampage. We certainly did not impersonate anybody.”

BNP spokesman Simon Darby said Mr Bamber’s leaflets were stronger than they would have issued, but said: “It’s not something we would put out directly but what does he say that’s not true? It’s the blunt truth. If he had told lies I would have disassociated ourselves and the party from it.”

York Press

Griffin seeks the Midas touch

April 8, 2008

Griffin and Co soak up the Spanish Sun-At the BNP members expense of course!

Far-right activists posting on a popular nazi forum recently got hot under the collar about whether it was right for the British National Party to put on a management training course in Spain rather than in Britain, until the site administrators pulled the discussion thread. But as usual they did not even get close to the heart of the story.

On 19 February Michaela Mackenzie, who styles herself “BNP Administration Support” and works full-time for the party, emailed several key BNP officers to invite them to “the next wave of high level management training”. This would be arranged by “a professional management consultancy and training company”, which “uses a property in Spain as its main training base”.

Knowing this would raise questions among the xenophobic party’s members, Mackenzie, a former employee of the BBC in Bristol, explained it was cheaper to send people there than to hire suitable facilities in Britain. “It also gives us the chance to say ‘tahnk you’ [sic] to our key officials for all the hard work you put into pushing the party forwards.”

The course would run from 1 to 4 April, but those who could not make those dates might find places on an earlier course from 26 to 29 March.

The height of the council and Greater London Authority election campaign is a strange time to be taking activists away to say “thank you”, when the party is constantly appealing to members to help with canvassing and leaflet distribution. One of those on the course was Nick Eriksen, the BNP’s London organiser, whose name was removed from the list of Assembly candidates while he was abroad, after the Evening Standard exposed his despicable views on rape. He appears still to be the London organiser.

Some BNP supporters wondered why the course could not have been held in the barn on Nick Griffin’s farm, which he converted with the help of a loan of several thousands pounds from the party shortly after he became its leader. The party quickly wrote off the loan on the grounds that the building would be available for party functions free of charge.

It is a good point, but Searchlight was more interested in the company that was running the course. It certainly seemed professional, judging by a report in the BNP’s new quarterly fundraising magazine, Hope and Glory, which featured a picture of the first batch of participants, clutching their course certificates, who were dispatched to Spain in the second week of February.

“Some of the lessons are so simple that they’re blindingly obvious,” one of them declared, “but until you’re taught by an expert you just don’t see them. I was already working hard for the party, but now I know how to ‘work smart’ as well.”

It did not take long for Searchlight to establish that the organiser was a Belfast-based business called the Midas Consultancy, not to be confused with a number of other training and consultancy businesses using similar names, and that the training base was in Valencia on the Costa Blanca.

Last October Arthur Kemp, who in summer 2007 was entrusted with the ideological training of party activists, went to Belfast to meet James Dowson, a businessman, self-styled vicar and militant anti-abortion campaigner.

Kemp, who is also in charge of the party’s internet operations, had been preceded that spring by Griffin and Collett, who claimed they were trying to increase the BNP’s appeal among Catholics by highlighting their opposition to abortion. Searchlight ensured that their meeting with Dowson, the founder of the controversial LifeLeague, made the press, prompting condemnation from other anti-abortion campaigners.

The true purpose of these meetings was to develop a business relationship and enable the BNP to benefit from Dowson’s skills in fundraising and management, which he markets through the Midas Consultancy. Kenny Smith, then the BNP’s administration officer, accompanied Griffin and Collett to Belfast and claims that he set up the arrangement. Smith was expelled during the major internal crisis in the BNP in December and the party is now taking legal action against him and others for alleged misuse of party membership lists.

The first outcome was the professionalisation of the BNP’s fundraising efforts in the form of the Building to Grow appeal at the end of last year, which the BNP claimed had raised £70,000. It was this fund that, the BNP said, paid for the new Excalibur warehouse to house and distribute party merchandise and publications. Sending the glossy Hope and Glory as a thank you to donors and encouragement to potential donors follows the example of the many charities that send out free magazines to supporters.

The second outcome was the management training courses on which, according to Hope and Glory, regional organisers would “join central staff as we implement a policy of ‘cascading’ management skills down through the party”. Revealing that the training was closely linked to the BNP’s election strategy, it continued: “The aim of these initial steps is to ensure that the people running the BNP’s national and regional structures will be ready to cope with the big increase in popular support, new members and potential that will follow if we can break though in style in the May elections. This progress will in turn set us up for an even bigger push for seats in the European Elections next year.”

The first course took in Griffin, Simon Darby (deputy leader and press officer), Mark Collett (graphic designer), Dave Hannan (former deputy treasurer), Mark Clutterbuck (head of the Central Management Team), Jackie Griffin (the leader’s wife) and Mackenzie herself. The presence of the unpopular Collett and Hannam showed that the two, whose incompetence and arrogance provoked the December’s internal crisis, are still at the heart of the party leadership despite their ostensible demotions. Whether Dowson’s training has helped them remains to be seen.

Dowson is a former member of the Orange Lodge in Northern Ireland and has admitted involvement with hardline loyalist groups in the West of Scotland. He was reported to have been the organiser of a flute band in Cumbernauld which recorded a tape in honour of Michael Stone, a member of the terrorist Ulster Freedom Fighters.

Stone was jailed for attacking a Republican funeral in west Belfast, throwing hand grenades and firing at the mourners, including women and children. Three people were killed.

The LifeLeague, which is secretive about its finances, uses highly provocative tactics, such as publishing the home addresses of abortion clinic staff. Similar actions by anti-abortion groups in the US have resulted in the murder of doctors.

Police have described LifeLeague’s tactics as “akin to those of animal rights extremists” and the group has been investigated by the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit.

Dowson has denied that he is a far-right sympathiser, claiming to be a Christian Socialist. In October, he told The Observer: “I find the whole of the right-wing utterly ridiculous”. That was around the same time he was meeting Kemp to set up his relationship with the BNP.

Hope not Hate

Usborne children’s books and the BNP

April 7, 2008

Usborne is a major independent UK publishing company that publishes almost every type of children’s book for every age from baby to teenager. As such, it has a well-deserved reputation for delivering top-quality books and it is rare to find a home or nursery that doesn’t have several well-thumbed Usborne books tucked away somewhere.

One of the innovative ways that Usborne goes about its business is via what the company refers to as Usborne organisers: that is, somebody home-based who sells the books for a commission. Nursery organisers frequently do this as it enables them to obtain discount books and to make a little money on the side by selling direct to parents. Generally, the profits made – and they can be substantial – are put back into the nursery/playgroup. Commission varies but starts at around 25%.

So what does Usborne have to do with the BNP?

Not a great deal as far as we know, but as we are all aware, the BNP is full of money-making scams and schemes and one of its current schemes is, we have found, selling Usborne books.

The BNP’s childen’s books section – sold via Excalibur, its cheap-tat-flogging arm – is a tad limited. For instance, while it sells Usborne’s books on Nelson, Florence Nightingale and Saint George and the Dragon (no surprise there), it manages to avoid offering some of Usbornes other history books on subjects such as the Holocaust, Anne Frank or Martin Luther King.

All Usborne organisers have to sign an Organiser Agreement before they are allowed to sign up and start selling. Some of the terms and conditions are listed below:

(3.1) You will conduct your business as an Usborne Organiser in an ethical and honest manner, and do nothing which may harm or damage the reputation of that business or the Company, or bring the Company into disrepute.

Clearly, whoever the organiser is, has not conducted their business in an ethical or honest manner, being in breach of section (3.3). Also, we believe an assumed relationship with the BNP would be damaging to the reputation of Usborne and would certainly bring it into disrepute.

(3.3) You will not sell the company’s products through or to any retail outlet, including on-line outlets, whether hosted by yourself or a third party. The only exception is if you have an official Usborne templated website, and you are compliant with all Usborne copyright requirements in all areas of your Usborne business.

The Usborne books on the Excalibur website can only be reached via the BNP’s own website. Both are retail outlets and neither have an official Usborne template. As the BNP constantly disregards copyright, we doubt that it is compliant with Usborne’s copyright requirements at all.

(14) This Agreement may be terminated immediately by either party if either party commits a material breach of its obligations to the other or if you do
anything which in the opinion of the Company is prejudicial to the Company’s interests. Either party may otherwise terminate this Agreement by giving to the other not less than 14 days written notice.

It seems to us that the BNP – or the person who has taken on the role of an Usborne organiser and is selling via the BNP’s Excalibur site – has breached these terms and has almost certainly acted in a way that ‘is prejudicial to the Company’s interests’. We feel sure that Usborne will want this association with the BNP broken – but they need to be informed in no uncertain terms that the association is there and that people are not happy about it. Thus, we would like you to get in touch with Usborne, to let them know your views on this matter. Please report back via the comments to this article.

Like a lot of other companies, Usborne does not display an email address, but it does have an online form to fill in here. If you prefer to write or phone, the details are below.

Usborne Books at Home
Unit 8, Oasis Park
Eynsham
Oxon OX29 4TU
United Kingdom

Telephone:
+44 (0) 1865 883731

Fax:
+44 (0) 1865 883759

A man with a chequered past

April 7, 2008
Max Mosley

The president of motor racing’s governing body finds himself at the heart of a very public sex scandal, but being the object of derision and scorn is not exactly a new situation for the son of Britain’s two most famous fascists

When Max Mosley was a young boy, his parents, Oswald and Diana Mosley, believed that a cultured education should include the study of German. To this end, Britain’s most infamous fascist couple sent their son to school for two years in Bavaria, where apparently he proved to be a gifted linguist. Little could the Mosleys have imagined that his facility with the German tongue would bring him an international renown almost as tawdry – though incomparably more harmless – as their own.

Last week, the News of the World ran an exposé of what it termed Mosley’s ‘sick Nazi orgy with 5 hookers’, complete with photos and, for the more staunchly inquisitive, a hidden-camera video-link of footage of the proceedings. Mosley was shown entering a Chelsea basement, where divested of clothing he was whipped and in turn whipped a prostitute. The session is said to have lasted five hours which, if nothing else, is undeniable testament to the 67-year-old’s stamina.

The newspaper alleged that the sadomasochism was part of some kind of Nazi prisoner scenario, and based this assertion partly on the fact that Mosley was heard to give instructions in German. As far as invasions of privacy go, it was an absolute blitzkrieg, a summary annexation of the personal, a total war on dignity.

Mosley is the president of world motor sport’s governing body, the FIA, and last week was told by the Crown Prince of Bahrain that he would be unwelcome at today’s grand prix in the kingdom. It’s like the Pope being told to stay away from a major Catholic cathedral. But strange times provoke strange measures, and these are strange times indeed for Mosley and, by association, motor racing.

German manufacturing giants BMW and Mercedes felt moved to issue this joint statement: ‘The content of the publications is disgraceful. As a company, we strongly distance ourselves from it.’ Adding that the consequences ‘extend far beyond the motor sport industry’.

Mosley responded with a piece of stiletto sarcasm. ‘Given the history of BMW and Mercedes-Benz, particularly before and during the Second World War, I fully understand why they should wish to strongly distance themselves from what they rightly describe as the disgraceful content of these publications.’ Ouch.

Rarely in recent years, has Formula One racing produced this kind of competition or, it must be acknowledged, entertainment. Of course, it’s unlikely to be quite so amusing to those involved, particularly Mosley, but he does not seem willing to ease the humiliation by quietly retiring from his position.

There are many things that could be said of Mosley, but a readiness to accept defeat is not chief among them. ‘He’s extraordinarily stubborn,’ says one F1 paddock insider. ‘He always thinks he can face a challenge down.’

Mosley was born in turmoil and spent much of his youth pursuing trouble. In May 1940, six weeks after his son’s birth, Sir Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists, was interned as a threat to state security. Five weeks later Mosley’s mother, Lady Diana Mosley, one of the Mitford sisters, was also imprisoned.

The Mosleys’ wedding – a second marriage for them both – took place in October 1936 at the Berlin home of the Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels. One of the guests was Hitler.

Mosley didn’t see his parents for the first three years of his life, aside from prison visits. And when eventually he did meet his mother, she was a distant presence. In her memoirs, Diana Mosley describes her son as precocious, amusing and a brave horse rider. But as he told one interviewer: ‘No, you wouldn’t cuddle her [his mother]. I’m closer to my children than I was to my parents. It was all those nannies, you know.’

Perhaps a psychiatrist could look at the Nazi sympathies of Mosley’s parents, the coldness of his mother, and make something of it all that might explain the theatrical sexual punishment in that Chelsea basement. Or perhaps not.

Either way, Mosley does not seem to be a man given to weighty introspection. Rather, he prefers to smooth over the awkwardness of his earlier years with a worldly charm that does not always conceal his unconventional opinions.

When asked what his father would have done had he been British dictator during the war, he said: ‘He would have made a deal with Hitler to protect the empire and he might have been right. When the dust settles and the awful things are forgotten, we’ll see.’

He also said that his parents believed that had there not been a war, then the Holocaust would not have happened.

His childhood was spent between homes in Ireland and Paris, and there was much travelling around the high end of Europe. Though ostensibly shunned by the British establishment, many aristocratic families and friends remained on good terms with the Mosleys. There were also visits to authoritarian politicians such as General Franco in Spain.

Mosley studied physics at Oxford. While still a student, he married Jean. They’ve been together for 48 years, and have two sons, Alexander and Patrick. ‘At Oxford,’ he recalled, ‘one was press-ganged into politics; people attack my father, so one had to defend him. But I can’t pretend I didn’t enjoy it.’

Indeed he joined his father’s Union Movement, the successor to the BUF, and took part in street battles in the East End. In 1962 he was arrested after attacking anti-fascist demonstrators who had knocked over his father. He told the court he could ‘not be expected to stand idly by’ and was acquitted. The year before, he canvassed in Moss Side for the Union Movement, which was campaigning to ‘send blacks home’.

Mosley does not seem to have renounced this past. Instead he cites his later attempt to stand as a Conservative candidate in the 1980s, and his support, including financial donations, for Tony Blair’s Labour government.

After Oxford he went on to specialise in trademark law. But his heart was in motor racing. He bought a car from the young Frank Williams, later leader of one of F1′s most successful teams, and set about establishing himself in F2. One of the things that he liked about the sport was its indifference to his background. He recalled thinking: ‘I’ve found a world where they don’t know about Oswald Mosley.’

The highlight of his career was once overtaking Graham Hill in a dangerous manoeuvre (this was at a time when driver fatalities were commonplace). ‘I could see him looking at me and thinking, “That bloke’s a complete lunatic.”‘

As things stand, Hill’s judgment is no longer a minority opinion. In fact, there were signs that Mosley, who became FIA president in a 1993 coup, had been losing the support of the paddock before the S&M story broke. For most of his reign, the word on Mosley has been best summarised by Frank Williams, who said he was ‘very, very intelligent and competent, with a streak of ruthlessness’.

With Bernie Ecclestone, the F1 kingpin, he has inspired fear and respect in equal measure, mostly notably, perhaps, in the 2005 F1 civil war, when he successfully thwarted a bid by the teams to take over the running of the sport. But some recent statements have offended sports insiders to a degree that may count against him. Of three-time F1 world champion, Sir Jackie Stewart, he said in December: ‘He knows nothing about sports governance. Because he never stops talking, he doesn’t know much about anything, actually. He just talks.’

What Stewart had been talking about on this occasion was the need to remove ‘any concern over the genuine independence and impartiality’ of the FIA, a suggestion that, though unstated, may have entailed the departure of Mosley.

His contract for the unpaid job of president (the expenses, including the use of a private jet, are not bad) is due to end in 2009. He’s spoken of going before, but each time stayed on usually, he admits, to spite those who say he should go.

This time, it’s different. Being turned away from Bahrain was a huge insult even to a man who has received more than a reasonable share of them. And the disapproval of the manufacturers is not easily dismissed with a sardonic comment. In the paddock over the weekend the talk has not been of Lewis Hamilton or Kimi Räikkönen. Instead it’s been devoted to the unusual sexual proclivities of a 67-year-old son of a fascist.

That’s not ideal for a sport that takes pride in its glamorous image and exclusive brand sponsors. But the opinion that matters more than any other is that of Ecclestone, who is the effective owner of F1. Mosley used to be Ecclestone’s lawyer. Now he’s waiting on his judgment.

So far Ecclestone’s been noncommittal. ‘He must do what he believes, in his heart of hearts, is the right thing,’ before adding, on a more philosophical note: ‘If Max was in bed with two hookers, they’d say, “good for you” or something like that. But this, as it is, people find it repulsive. I think that’s the problem.’

And for the man who once overtook Graham Hill, it may prove impossible to put behind him.

The Mosley Lowdown

Born 13 April 1940

Best of times In 1993, he was appointed president of the FIA. The FIA Senate called for him to stay on when he announced his retirement in 2004.

Worst of times If not now, maybe in 1961 when he was fined for obstructing a policeman while demonstrating against an anti-apartheid protest

What he says ‘I don’t mind flak: I come from a family where we have had flak all our lives.’
Explaining his robust attitude to professional criticism in February.

What others say
‘I don’t honestly believe this affects the sport in any way. Knowing Max it might be all a bit of a joke. You know, it’s one of those things where he’s sort of taking the piss, rather than anything against Jewish people.’
Bernie Ecclestone on the ‘Nazi orgy’ allegations.

‘He makes decisions by himself. They ignore all those on the ground. A federation is an association of clubs and this federation must defend the interests of those clubs.’
Jacques Regis, head of Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, in 2004.

The Observer

France shocked by attack on Muslim war graves

April 7, 2008

ABLAIN-SAINT-NAZAIRE, France (AFP) — Vandals desecrated 148 Muslim graves in France’s biggest war cemetery, hanging a pig’s head from one tombstone and daubing slogans insulting France’s Muslim justice minister, officials said Sunday.

President Nicolas Sarkozy expressed “profound outrage” at the “sordid” attack on the Muslim quarter of the Notre Dame de Lorette cemetery, near the northern town of Arras on Saturday night. He vowed that those responsible would be punished.

The cemetery is France’s biggest military graveyards and commemorates tens of thousands of victims of a series of long and bloody battles for control of northern France at the start of World War I.

The attack came almost exactly a year after a similar incident in which neo-Nazi vandals scrawled swastikas on 52 of the cemetery’s Muslim graves.
“This is the most inadmissible kind of racism and the president of the republic shares the pain of France’s entire Muslim community,” said a statement issued by the presidency. France’s Muslim community is Europe’s largest at around five million. “This hateful act is also a attack on the memory of all veterans of World War I, beyond the faith of each one,” the statement added.

The state prosecutor for Arras, Jean-Pierre Valensi, said “the slogans directly target Islam and they gravely insult Rachida Dati, the justice minister,” who is the daughter of north African immigrants. He said a pig’s head was hung from one of the graves.

Dati issued a statement condemning a “hateful act” that “hurts the memory of our dead, of the veterans who gave their lives for France”.

“Through its racist connotations, it is an assault on the values of the republic and an insult to all French people.”

Muslim community leaders were allowed to visit the scene on Sunday. “This is shameful to see,” said the regional head of the French Council for the Muslim Religion, Bahssine Saaidi. “We need to work together… to stop this problem of racism,” he added.

“These are probably the tombs of heroes who fell in combat. This is a hateful, scandalous act, an insult to all Muslims,” Dalil Boubaker, rector of the Paris mosque, told France Info radio.

The MRAP anti-racism group said the attack was “a worrying sign of an ill that is gaining ground with a degree of impunity: islamophobia” and warned that France needed to face up to the problem.

SOS Racism said it was taking legal action to demand the dismantling of the neo-Nazi group behind the April 2007 attack on the cemetery.

Two youths aged 18 and 21, both members of the group, were jailed for a year over that attack. A 16-year-old also received a six-week prison sentence.

The Elysee said Sarkozy had called for a swift inquiry and “for those responsible for this act to be punished as they deserve.”

Around 100 French gendarmes were at the site to gather evidence. Jean-Marie Bockel, the secretary of state for veteran’s affairs, said the government would review security at Notre Dame de Lorette.

“This is horrific, and for the 90th anniversary of the end of the 1914-1918 war. This is worse than the last time, it is abominable,” said Jean-Paul Doue, one of 3,800 volonteer honorary guards at the cemetery.

Inaugurated in 1925, the Notre Dame de Lorette cemetery houses the remains of some 40,000 soldiers, half of them in named graves. The Muslim quarter includes 576 tombs, grouped together and turned towards Mecca.

Prior to 2007, there were four incidents involving the desecration of Muslim graves in northern and eastern France in 2004, and one in 2003.

There have also been several attacks on Jewish graves in cemeteries across France in recent years.

AFP

Public perception was reason for sacking BNP ‘rape lie’ candidate

April 4, 2008


The BNP dropped its number two candidate from its London Assembly list only because his belief that “rape is simply sex” might have lost the party votes. An official statement by the party avoided stating that Nick Eriksen’s comments about women in his own Sir John Bull blog were actually offensive and outrageous, but was concerned only about how they would have been perceived.

“It was felt that no matter how much Nick Erikson’s [sic] blog comments, written back in 2005, had been distorted and taken out of the context of a blog which reflected our tough stance on all sorts of crime,” said the BNP, “they could still be perceived as trivialising the issue in a manner that many women in particular could have found extremely offensive. As such it was agreed that there should not be any ambiguity with regards real crimes against real women in our capital city by somebody about to enter government.”

In fact it is the BNP that is distorting the issue. Eriksen’s blog entry of 24 August 2005 was entirely devoted to an attack on women. Under the heading “Rape: lies, lies, lies”, he wrote: “I’ve never really understood why so many men have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the feminazi myth machine into believing that rape is such a serious crime. … Rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal. To suggest that rape, when conducted without violence, is a serious crime is like suggesting that force feeding a woman chocolate cake is a heinous offence. A woman would be more inconvenienced by having her handbag snatched.”

It was not the only time he had revealed his views on women. The following month he attacked women who put off having children to have a career: “And let’s be honest, for a woman to consider a job or career more important than having children is, quite literally, unnatural.”

Returning to the subject in November 2005 in an item entitled “Give her a slap!”, Eriksen approvingly quoted Noel Coward as saying: “Some women are like gongs – they need to be struck regularly.” Later that month he wrote that mothers “should never go out to work” and described career women as “unnatural and vile”.

It is unclear whether Eriksen remains the BNP’s London organiser. The party has given no indication that he has been sacked.

The day before Eriksen was withdrawn from the candidates’ list, Simon Darby, the BNP’s press officer and deputy leader, had attacked the Evening Standard’s exposure of Eriksen as a “smear”, accusing the journalist Andrew Gilligan of “badgering” the former Conservative councillor and of “taking completely out of context samples from Nick’s former satirical and provocative blog”.

Eriksen was condemned in the House of Commons when Tory MP Charles Walker said he was not “fit to run for public office”.

Deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman, standing in for Gordon Brown at Prime Minister’s questions, replied: “I strongly support your comments and I thank you for bringing this matter to the House.”

She added: “The best way to avoid a BNP member being elected to the London Assembly is to make sure that as many people as possible vote for all the other parties.”

Boris Johnson, the Conservative candidate for London mayor, has also attacked the BNP. After the BNP recommended that its supporters list the “Tory clown Johnson” as their second preference in the mayoral election because he was “a lesser evil than the Marxist crank Livingstone”, Johnson said: “I utterly and unreservedly condemn the BNP and have no desire whatsoever to receive a single second-preference vote from a BNP supporter. I hope as many Londoners as possible turn out on May 1 to prevent the election of a BNP candidate.”

Brian Paddick, the Liberal Democrat candidate, said: “Clearly the BNP have recognised Boris’s talent for causing offence and creating division. This should be a wake-up call for all decent people who could vote in the election to register their vote because the more votes there are for mainstream parties, the less chance there will be to give racists and extremists a seat.”

The BNP needs to get at least 5% in the London-wide election for top-up members of the Assembly to guarantee a seat. If it gets 8% the party is likely to gain two seats. The withdrawal of Eriksen means the failed business Robert Bailey has moved up to second position behind Richard Barnbrook. Bailey and Barnbrook are respectively deputy leader and leader of the BNP’s useless council group in Barking and Dagenham.

Despite the BNP’s current setbacks, it could win up to three seats and that would change the nature of politics in London. It is vital that everyone who opposes the racism of the BNP turns out and makes their voice heard.

Hope not Hate

BNP strikes a sour note with Katherine

April 4, 2008

When the up-and-coming singing star Katherine Jenkins posed innocently in a Welsh rugby strip five years ago to promote the Wales anthem Bread Of Heaven, she could have had no idea the image would one day be used in a hate campaign by the extreme British National Party.

Now the acclaimed mezzo-soprano has taken offence to the use of the smiling picture from when she was on the cusp of fame.

Lawyers for the Neath-born star were last night working to have the image removed from a BNP video produced as part of its opposition to the opening of a mosque in Cardiff.

Says a member of Katherine’s management team: “These are nasty people and Katherine wants to have absolutely nothing to do with them. We are trying to trace how they got the picture and it was not passed on by the photographer or his agent. It is just stirring things up and we are striving to have the image removed.”

Daily Mail

Latest Video From IrishTony

April 3, 2008

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.